What it is
Context Library is where you store reusable strategic inputs for content creation. These documents become shared guidance for topic generation and post writing. Context applies across your enabled content collections, not only articles.Why it matters
Without context, content tends to be generic. With a strong Context Library, outputs stay aligned to:- Your positioning
- Your terminology
- Your editorial standards
- Your product and category reality
Document types
Skayle supports four document types:| Type | Purpose | Best use |
|---|---|---|
Facts | Stable truths and references | Product facts, ICP facts, market definitions |
Guidelines | Preferred style and approach | Tone, framing style, examples style |
Rules | Hard constraints | Must/never statements, compliance language |
Other | Supporting context | Campaign notes, one-off references |
How context influences content
Context Library content influences:- Topic creation: better topic relevance and framing
- Article writing: stronger specificity and consistency
- Tone: closer alignment to your intended voice
- Positioning: clearer category stance and differentiation
Plans and content types
Articlesare available on all plans.- Additional non-article collections (Answers, Glossary, Guides, etc.) require the
Authorityplan. - Your Context Library can be reused for both article and non-article outputs.
Best practices
- Keep documents specific and explicit.
- Separate hard rules from flexible guidance.
- Prefer concrete language over abstract statements.
- Update documents when your messaging changes.
- Avoid conflicting rules across documents.
Strong vs weak context examples
| Quality | Example | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Strong | ”Primary ICP: B2B SaaS teams, 20-200 employees, in-house marketing lead.” | Clear, usable targeting signal |
| Weak | ”We target many businesses.” | Too vague to guide output |
| Strong | ”Do not describe us as an AI writing tool. Position as ranking + AI visibility platform.” | Enforces correct positioning |
| Weak | ”Use a nice tone.” | Not actionable |
| Strong | ”When discussing results, prefer measurable wording: clicks, impressions, rankings, citation coverage.” | Ties writing to decision metrics |
| Weak | ”Talk about growth.” | Ambiguous and broad |